Golf Today - Over 80000 pages of golf information
Golf News
 PETER ALLISS
 On the Air

The long road to anarchy?

The history of the long-shafted putter has come a long way since its rather innocent introduction on the US Senior Tour some 30 years ago. A number of professionals said it had saved their flagging careers. Instead of twitching and jerking like a puppet on a string over a four-footer, they felt a freedom not experienced since those far-away teenage years.

Nobody took a lot of notice until fairly recently when many tournaments and, indeed, major championships have been won by players using a longshafted putter – ahead of this year’s Masters, four of the last five majors, in fact. The putters vary in length. Adam Scott, the talented Australian, has possibly the longest one in existence.

Then there’s Keegan Bradley and Ernie Els, who uses one with a long shaft but perhaps as much as 12 inches shorter than Scott’s. Bernhard Langer, who’s had more putting problems than David Cameron has detractors, went through a whole repertoire of strokes, grips and lengths of putter until settling on the one he uses now, with great success.

There had been a lot of talk over the past few years about its legality but mostly this was hot air. Some professionals, who’ve been using a long putter with great dexterity, suggested they might sue the powers that be for loss of income if they could no longer use their magic wand, claiming the rule-makers were jeopardising their livelihood.

Nevertheless, last autumn the Royal & Ancient Golf Club of St Andrews (R&A) and the United States Golf Association (USGA), the game’s lawmakers, did do something. They said they were going to introduce a new rule, effective from January 2016, which would ban the anchoring of a putter against any part of a player’s body. Thus would the belly-putter, indeed any long putter, cease to be in play.

They declared there would be a consultation period, until the end of February 2013, for interested parties to submit their views. One such view, aired in January, came from Mark King, chief executive of TaylorMade, who said: “The anchoring ban makes no sense to me at all. If I were running the PGA of America, I would write my own set of rules. I’d do it with the PGA Tour. The industry needs to come together without the USGA. Leave them out.”

What: anarchy in the game of golf? But who knows, that might happen. The PGA Tour and the PGA of America are both against the new rule – “You can’t point top one negative impact of anchoring,” said Tim Finchem, commissioner of the PGA Tour – while on March 4, the European Tour “confirmed its support for the R&A and USGA and their proposal”.

So we have a transatlantic split. Where will things go from here? Finchem was careful not to say that if the R&A and USGA went ahead anyway then the PGA Tour might makes it own rules in this area. “We have carefully and intentionally avoided getting into a discussion about that issue,” he said. So that’s not a ‘yes’ but it’s not a ‘no’ either.

I was brought up in the belief that the putter was always the shortest club in the bag, and I will remain of that view until the day I die. Putters longer than drivers make no sense to me but they do work for some. But as I go round the country visiting many golf clubs, I see very few club golfers with long putters. They find them far too difficult to use, and until they allow putters to be made the same way as snooker cues (so that they come in two halves and they fit easily in the golf bag), I don’t think they ever will catch on.

I have said for many years that the game of golf should not be changed for a few hundred people who play at the top level. They talk about golf courses becoming too short, but too short for whom? Answer: for a handful of people who hit the ball miles because the equipment has got so much better and perhaps because the players today have smaller waists, wider shoulders and hit the ball harder. Rather like the question of throttling back on the length a golf ball travels, perhaps at the end of the day it might be better to leave the whole thing alone.

But the R&A and USGA are the two final adjudicators of the game. I would have thought whatever they say should go. I know they lost some ground years ago with the controversial V-shaped grooves in iron clubs. Then they were threatened by the golf club manufacturers: “We will sue you for millions.” Some pros joined in, saying: “You are affecting our livelihoods.”

They gave up the battle. They didn’t fight. Why should they do so this time and does it really make a lot of difference? Overall, though, I believe the R&A and the USGA can, within reason, do what they like with the rules of the game. They are in charge, or at least they should be.

May 2013

Reproduced with kind permission of Golf International Magazine

 






Golf International App

Rickie Fowler, Puma & Arnie Army to honor Arnold Palmer

Sketchers unveil 2018 GO GOLF collection

Mickelson brings Major appeal to Scotland

Reed aiming to master Gullane as he returns to the Aberdeen Standard Investments Scottish Open

Fitzpatrick joins PGA TOUR as Special Temporary Member

Phil Mickelson apologizes for US Open conduct

Aussie Open champion Peter Thomson dies aged 88

In-form Fleetwood eyes glory in Germany

Fleetwood ready to carry momentum into Scottish Open

More news


BMW International Open R2: Hend makes most of windy conditions to take BMW lead

Travelers Championship R1: Jordan Spieth & Zach Johnson tied

American Family Insurance Championship

Latest Official World Golf Ranking

Current European Tour Race to Dubai Standings

Current PGA Tour FedEx Cup Standings

LET & Leadingcourses.com partnering to promote best championship courses

Swedes in search of major success at Jabra Ladies Open

IK Kim & Catriona Matthew will return to Royal Lytham

Laura Davies first woman to compete in Staysure Tour event

Walmart NW Arkansas Championship

More news

© Golftoday.co.uk 1996-2018 - Terms & Conditions - Privacy Policy - About Us - Advertise - Classifieds - Newsletter - Contact Us